Bitget App
Trade smarter
MarketsTradeFuturesEarnSquareMore
Federal Judge Blocks Trump’s Attempt to Pressure UC Through Funding

Federal Judge Blocks Trump’s Attempt to Pressure UC Through Funding

Bitget-RWA2025/11/15 21:36
By:Bitget-RWA

- A federal judge blocked Trump's plan to defund UC over antisemitism claims, citing First and Tenth Amendment violations. - The $1.2B funding demand and civil rights investigations were deemed coercive tactics to suppress "woke" academic views. - UC warned the financial threat would devastate its research programs, while critics called the strategy authoritarian. - The ruling preserves UC's funding but leaves unresolved tensions over government influence in higher education.

A federal judge has halted the Trump administration’s efforts to withdraw funding from the University of California (UC) system, determining that the attempt to punish the university over claims of antisemitism and discrimination breaches constitutional rights. On November 15, 2025, U.S. District Judge Rita Lin in San Francisco granted a preliminary injunction, stopping the administration from levying penalties or suspending federal grants without proper legal procedures. She described the move as part of a larger initiative to eliminate “woke,” “left-leaning,” and “socialist” perspectives from the nation’s top universities

. This ruling represents a major blow to the Trump administration’s strategy of using financial threats to pressure universities into adopting conservative values.

The administration’s campaign began in the summer of 2025, when it demanded that UC pay $1.2 billion to regain access to frozen research funds,

.
Federal Judge Blocks Trump’s Attempt to Pressure UC Through Funding image 0
This demand was part of a broader pattern targeting prestigious schools, with similar measures taken against Columbia University and other private institutions. Judge Lin concluded that the administration’s practice—initiating civil rights probes to justify funding cuts—amounted to “coercive and retaliatory actions that violate the First and Tenth Amendments” . She noted that UC faculty had presented “substantial evidence” of a systematic attempt to undermine academic freedom, with some scholars reportedly avoiding research topics considered “too leftist or woke” .

The decision highlights ongoing friction between the Trump administration and higher education, a frequent target of conservative scrutiny. The administration has criticized diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives as unfair, claiming they disadvantage white and Asian American students. In October 2025, officials offered a contentious agreement to nine universities,

. Although UC was not part of this proposal, the broader approach reflects an effort to reshape academia through financial influence.

UC President James B. Milliken cautioned that the $1.2 billion demand would severely harm the system,

. The administration’s settlement offers also aimed to limit international student enrollment based on “anti-Western” or “anti-American” beliefs and . Judge Lin’s order specifically prohibited these requirements, stating they violate constitutional protections.

The case has sparked strong opposition from advocacy organizations and Democratic leaders. California Governor Gavin Newsom warned that universities accepting the administration’s terms would lose state support, while Democracy Forward, a progressive legal advocacy group,

. The administration has not yet commented on the ruling, but its broader agenda—including efforts to reduce federal agencies and alter social policy, such as cutting Medicaid payments to Planned Parenthood and targeting the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau—demonstrates a consistent use of fiscal measures to pursue ideological objectives .

With the injunction in effect, the UC system has avoided an immediate financial crisis but still faces ongoing risks. The administration’s campaign against universities, presented as a defense of free speech, has instead ignited debates about academic independence and the government’s influence over education. As the legal battle continues, the outcome may set a precedent for resolving federal funding disputes—and determine whether universities can withstand politically driven financial pressure.

0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

You may also like

SEI Faces a Turning Point: Will It Be a Death Cross or a Golden Cross?

- SEI , Sei's native token, shows early recovery signs amid crypto market slump, with technical indicators suggesting potential breakout from prolonged consolidation. - Despite 2.83% 24-hour decline to $0.17, increased $114.1M trading volume and TD Sequential buy signals highlight critical inflection point potential. - Market analysis identifies $0.1756 support and $0.1776 resistance levels, with death cross risks below $0.1745 and golden cross potential above $0.1787. - Fear/greed index at 25 reflects ext

Bitget-RWA2025/11/16 03:40
SEI Faces a Turning Point: Will It Be a Death Cross or a Golden Cross?

Bitcoin News Update: CFTC's Broader Role in Crypto Regulation Ignites Discussion on Clearer Rules

- U.S. lawmakers propose expanding CFTC's crypto oversight via a bill reclassifying spot trading, diverging from SEC's enforcement approach. - Harvard University invests $443M in BlackRock's IBIT ETF, reflecting institutional confidence in crypto as a legitimate asset class. - DeFi projects like Mutuum Finance raise $18.7M in presales, leveraging regulatory momentum and transparent on-chain credit systems. - RockToken's infrastructure-backed crypto contracts attract long-term investors with structured yiel

Bitget-RWA2025/11/16 03:00
Bitcoin News Update: CFTC's Broader Role in Crypto Regulation Ignites Discussion on Clearer Rules

DASH Aster DEX's Latest On-Chain Growth and What It Means for DeFi Liquidity

- DASH Aster DEX leads 2025 DeFi shift with hybrid AMM-CEX model and multi-chain support (BNB, Ethereum , Solana), boosting TVL to $1.399B and Q3 daily trading volumes of $27.7B. - Platform's 1,650% ASTER token price surge post-TGE attracted 330,000 new wallets, with 94% of BSC-USD volume ($2B/day) driving institutional adoption via Binance/YZi partnerships. - ASTER token mechanics enable 80% margin trading, 5-7% staking rewards, and governance rights, while annual 5-7% fee burns create scarcity and align

Bitget-RWA2025/11/16 03:00
DASH Aster DEX's Latest On-Chain Growth and What It Means for DeFi Liquidity

Astar 2.0: Leading a New Generation of DeFi and Cross-Chain Advancements

- Astar 2.0 introduces a zkEVM mainnet and cross-chain interoperability, slashing gas fees and enabling 150,000 TPS with 2025 scalability goals. - Strategic partnerships with Mazda, Japan Airlines, and Sony demonstrate blockchain's real-world applications in logistics, loyalty programs, and digital asset tokenization. - Q3 2025 data shows $2.38M DeFi TVL growth and 20% active wallet increase, alongside a $3.16M institutional ASTR token acquisition. - The platform aims to solidify its role as a foundational

Bitget-RWA2025/11/16 02:44
Astar 2.0: Leading a New Generation of DeFi and Cross-Chain Advancements