SBF's lawyer completed the closing argument and insisted on defending SBF not guilty.
SBF's attorney Mark S. Cohen completed his closing argument in court on Wednesday evening local time, requesting the court and jury to find that SBF acted in "good faith" throughout its operation of FTX and Alameda Research, and therefore cannot be found guilty of fraud. In his closing argument, the attorney stated that it was "real-world miscommunications," "mistakes," and "delays" that harmed other members of FTX and Bankman-Fried's crypto empire, not intentional fraud.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
CandyBomb x BOOST: Deposit or Trade to share 8,332,000 BOOST!
Crypto Loan Carnival round 24: Borrow USDT, USDC to enjoy an APR discount of up to 40%
New spot margin trading pair — JTO/USDT!
Announcement on Sonic(S)tokenomics changes
Trending news
MoreCrypto prices
More








