Crypto crime losses hit $4.3M amid lax rules and FOMO
Crypto crime losses reached a record high in the first half of 2025, nearly matching the total losses recorded in all of 2024.
Bill Callahan, a retired DEA agent and cryptocurrency investigator, told Cointelegraph that slow regulations, fear of missing out (FOMO), and growing crypto adoption have created conditions favourable to criminal activity.
“The rapid proliferation of new crypto assets, particularly memecoins, combined with a surge in retail investors and limited regulatory oversight, creates opportunities for criminal activity, including theft, bogus investment schemes, scams and frauds.” Callahan said.
“the bad guys have time, money and resources on their side to perfect criminal activity, and they don’t need to get it right all the time to still make a handsome profit.” he added.
security firm CertiK reported that the average loss per security incident in 2025 has been $4.3 million, with a median loss of $103,996.
Natalie Newson, senior blockchain investigator at CertiK, said a “convergence of conditions” has emboldened criminals.
“Influencers and key opinion leaders continue to launch tokens with questionable intent, profiting through tactics like sniping and leaving retail investors exposed.” she noted.
Solidus Labs found that 98.7% of tokens on the launchpad Pump.fun show signs of pump-and-dump schemes.
Newson also highlighted challenges faced by law enforcement, including limited resources, cross-jurisdictional issues, and cybercriminals’ technical sophistication.
A 2024 Chainalysis report pointed to money laundering as a significant challenge for authorities.
Hank Huang, CEO of Kronos Research, criticised regulators for “swinging from overreach to underreaction,” saying “we are seeing too little accountability.”
“the fix isn’t more crackdowns; it’s smart, targeted regulation and finding balance to continue driving mass adoption.” he argued.
Huang added that zero losses are impossible due to crypto’s decentralised and anonymous nature, and the focus should be on reducing risks for users.
“These attacks are less about targeting crypto and more about testing the limits of emerging systems.” he said.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Borrowing short to repay long: The Bank of England and the Bank of Japan lead the shift from long-term bonds to high-frequency "interest rate gambling"
If expectations are not met, the government will face risks of uncontrollable costs and fiscal sustainability due to frequent rollovers.

How do 8 top investment banks view 2026? Gemini has summarized the key points for you
2026 will not be a year suitable for passive investing; instead, it will belong to investors who are skilled at interpreting market signals.

Valuation Soars to 11 Billions: How Is Kalshi Defying Regulatory Pressure to Surge Ahead?
While Kalshi faces lawsuits and regulatory classification as gambling in multiple states, its trading volume is surging and its valuation has soared to 11 billion dollars, revealing the structural contradictions of prediction markets rapidly growing in the legal gray areas of the United States.

How will the Federal Reserve in 2026 impact the crypto industry?
Shifting from the technocratic caution of the Powell era, the policy framework is moving towards a more explicit goal of reducing borrowing costs and serving the president's economic agenda.

