Norwegian Sovereign Fund Boosts Bitcoin Holdings 192% YOY
- Norges Bank’s Bitcoin exposure increases 192% in 2025.
- Exposure through stakes in major BTC treasury holders.
- No direct Bitcoin purchases by Norges Bank found.
Norway’s sovereign wealth fund, Norges Bank Investment Management, increased its indirect Bitcoin exposure by 192% year-on-year in 2025, accumulating 7,161 BTC through equity stakes in Bitcoin-treasury companies.
This places the fund among the largest institutional Bitcoin holders, highlighting a trend of rising indirect Bitcoin investments amid regulatory restrictions.
Norges Bank Investment Management (NBIM) increased its Bitcoin exposure by 192% YOY. This change reflects strategic investments in companies like Strategy and Marathon Digital, known for large Bitcoin holdings. NBIM acts as an institutional allocator.
Though NBIM has expanded Bitcoin exposure, no direct positions in cryptocurrencies were noted. Vetle Lunde, a Senior Analyst at K33 Research, highlighted the indirect strategy using equity stakes rather than direct BTC purchases, emphasizing diversified portfolios.
No direct effects on cryptocurrency markets or regulations have emerged. BTC exposure came through public Bitcoin treasury companies, primarily Strategy. Analyst Vetle Lunde commented on the growing role of Bitcoin in diversified portfolios.
Financial implications arise from NBIM’s holdings in companies with significant Bitcoin treasuries. Although no regulatory changes were noted, the trend of institutional investment indirectly engaging with Bitcoin seems intact, driven by market dynamics and corporate strategies.
Possible outcomes include increased institutional adoption of cryptocurrencies through indirect exposure. These moves could shape portfolio strategies, with Bitcoin’s role in corporate treasuries gaining momentum as seen in past market shifts.
Institutional strategies involving Bitcoin reflect broader trends since 2021. Historical precedents like MicroStrategy and Tesla show similar shifts, resulting in Bitcoin price impacts and investor interest. Such steps highlight Bitcoin’s proliferation in institutional portfolios.
The trend highlights how Bitcoin is increasingly appearing in diversified portfolios, whether intentionally or as a byproduct of equity investments in BTC-heavy companies. – Vetle Lunde, Senior Analyst, K33 Research
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
The Atlantic: How Will Cryptocurrency Trigger the Next Financial Crisis?
Bitcoin fell below $90,000, and the cryptocurrency market lost $1.2 trillions in six weeks. Stablecoins, criticized for disguising risks as safety, have been identified as potential triggers for a financial crisis, and the GENIUS Act could increase these risks. Summary generated by Mars AI. This summary was generated by the Mars AI model, and the accuracy and completeness of its content are still being iteratively updated.

Bitcoin Surrenders Early as Market Awaits Nvidia’s Earnings Report Tomorrow
Global risk assets have experienced a significant decline recently, with both the US stock market and the cryptocurrency market plunging simultaneously. This is mainly due to investor fears of an AI bubble and uncertainty surrounding the Federal Reserve's monetary policy. Concerns over the AI sector intensified ahead of Nvidia's earnings report, while uncertainty in macroeconomic data further increased market volatility. The correlation between Bitcoin and tech stocks has strengthened, leading to split market sentiment, with some investors choosing to wait and see or buy the dip. Summary generated by Mars AI. The accuracy and completeness of the content generated by the Mars AI model are still being iteratively improved.

Recent Market Analysis: Bitcoin Falls Below Key Support Level, Market on High Alert, Preparing for a No Rate Cut Scenario
Due to the uncertainty surrounding the Federal Reserve’s decision in December, it may be wiser to act cautiously and control positions rather than attempting to predict a short-term bottom.

If HYPE and PUMP were stocks, they would both be undervalued.
If these were stocks, their trading prices would be at least 10 times higher, if not more.

