US House Ties CBDC Ban to Defense Policy Bill
In a significant move impacting the future of digital currency, the US House of Representatives has inserted a sweeping provision into its annual defense policy legislation that would prohibit the Federal Reserve from developing or issuing a central bank digital currency (CBDC).
In a significant move impacting the future of digital currency, the US House of Representatives has inserted a sweeping provision into its annual defense policy legislation that would prohibit the Federal Reserve from developing or issuing a central bank digital currency (CBDC).
The updated version of HR 3838—the House’s draft of the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) was released Thursday by the House Rules Committee. The nearly 1,300-page bill now includes language blocking the Fed from creating, testing, or studying a digital currency, while also barring the central bank from offering financial services directly to individuals.
Source
:
US House of Representatives
The NDAA is considered “must-pass” legislation because it dictates military spending and national security priorities, making it a frequent vehicle for unrelated policy measures that may otherwise stall in Congress.
Republicans have been pushing to outlaw a US CBDC for more than a year. In July, the House narrowly approved the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act in a 219–210 vote, though that bill faces an uncertain path in the Senate. Conservative Republicans secured a promise from party leaders to attach the CBDC ban to the defense bill after threatening to block movement on other crypto-related legislation. At one point, their standoff delayed House proceedings for more than nine hours, the longest such holdup in the chamber’s history.
The new NDAA language makes clear that the restriction does not apply to stablecoins. It explicitly states that “any dollar-denominated currency that is open, permissionless, and private” would not fall under the ban.
House Republicans have repeatedly framed CBDCs as a threat to privacy and financial freedom. Representative Tom Emmer first introduced a version of the CBDC Anti-Surveillance State Act in early 2023, but the proposal lapsed at the end of the last Congress. He reintroduced it this year, with GOP leaders arguing it aligns with President Donald Trump’s January executive order opposing CBDCs.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
The Atlantic: How Will Cryptocurrency Trigger the Next Financial Crisis?
Bitcoin fell below $90,000, and the cryptocurrency market lost $1.2 trillions in six weeks. Stablecoins, criticized for disguising risks as safety, have been identified as potential triggers for a financial crisis, and the GENIUS Act could increase these risks. Summary generated by Mars AI. This summary was generated by the Mars AI model, and the accuracy and completeness of its content are still being iteratively updated.

Bitcoin Surrenders Early as Market Awaits Nvidia’s Earnings Report Tomorrow
Global risk assets have experienced a significant decline recently, with both the US stock market and the cryptocurrency market plunging simultaneously. This is mainly due to investor fears of an AI bubble and uncertainty surrounding the Federal Reserve's monetary policy. Concerns over the AI sector intensified ahead of Nvidia's earnings report, while uncertainty in macroeconomic data further increased market volatility. The correlation between Bitcoin and tech stocks has strengthened, leading to split market sentiment, with some investors choosing to wait and see or buy the dip. Summary generated by Mars AI. The accuracy and completeness of the content generated by the Mars AI model are still being iteratively improved.

Recent Market Analysis: Bitcoin Falls Below Key Support Level, Market on High Alert, Preparing for a No Rate Cut Scenario
Due to the uncertainty surrounding the Federal Reserve’s decision in December, it may be wiser to act cautiously and control positions rather than attempting to predict a short-term bottom.

If HYPE and PUMP were stocks, they would both be undervalued.
If these were stocks, their trading prices would be at least 10 times higher, if not more.

