Tariffs and Weak Jobs Fuel Consumer Caution, Hiding Economy's Fractures
- July U.S. PCE data showed 0.2% price rise and 0.5% spending growth, but discretionary sectors like hospitality weakened due to tariff-driven price hikes. - Tariffs impacted 2/3 of S&P 500 sectors, with GM, Ford, Walmart reporting costs spikes, while consumers shifted to essentials and stockpiled goods. - Weak labor market and rising inflation created fragile consumer balance, with spending outpacing income gains and savings depletion risks. - Fed faces stagflation risks as July data masked underlying cra
July’s personal income and outlays report painted a mixed picture of U.S. consumer behavior, with strong spending in certain sectors masking underlying vulnerabilities. While the core PCE price index rose 0.2% month-over-month, in line with expectations, and personal spending increased 0.5%, economists highlighted a slowdown in discretionary categories such as food services and hospitality. This trend has been attributed to the ripple effects of tariff policies, which are quietly influencing consumer behavior by pushing up prices on imported goods and limiting choices in key product categories [5].
The U.S. consumer has largely held up in the face of rising inflation and ongoing uncertainties, particularly in the labor market. However, spending patterns suggest a more cautious approach, with households opting to spend on necessities and stockpiling durable goods in anticipation of potential price hikes. This shift has created a fragile equilibrium, where spending growth outpaced income gains in July, drawing on savings and reducing the cushion available for further economic shocks [5].
Tariffs have had a visible impact on business operations and pricing strategies across multiple sectors. A Yahoo Finance analysis of Q2 earnings calls revealed that at least seven of the 11 S&P 500 sectors—accounting for over two-thirds of listed companies—reported negative impacts from Trump’s trade policies. For instance, the Consumer Discretionary sector saw General Motors and Ford reporting significant tariff-related losses, while Home Depot and TJX indicated plans for price increases. In the Consumer Staples sector, companies like Walmart and Kraft Heinz acknowledged rising costs and potential margin compression due to tariffs [6].
The economic effects of tariffs extend beyond corporate profits, influencing consumer behavior and broader inflation dynamics. Wells Fargo economists noted that the decline in discretionary spending—particularly in services—suggests households are adapting to price pressures in subtle but telling ways. This trend is compounded by the current weak labor market, which has seen job growth slow to anemic levels. Claudia Sahm, creator of the Sahm Rule recession indicator, warned that while the Fed may currently be focusing more on inflation, the labor market remains a critical area of concern. A weaker jobs market could erode consumer confidence and force more aggressive spending cuts in the near future [5].
Despite these challenges, the U.S. consumer remains a resilient force. BMO economist Jennifer Lee pointed to a modest rebound in wage growth in July as a positive sign, indicating that households still have some flexibility to absorb price increases. However, this cushion may not last, especially if tariffs persist and job growth remains soft. Morningstar’s Preston Caldwell noted that year-over-year spending growth has already decelerated, with services driving the decline while goods spending remains stable due to forward-buying behavior [5].
The Fed faces a complex balancing act as it navigates these mixed signals. While the July PCE data showed inflation in line with expectations, the underlying shifts in consumer behavior and labor market weakness suggest a growing risk of stagflationary pressures. The central bank’s upcoming policy decisions will be critical in addressing these tensions, particularly as the September FOMC meeting approaches. Markets are currently pricing in an 85% probability of a 25-basis-point rate cut in September, with some anticipation for a second cut in the following months [2].
As the economy grapples with the combined pressures of tariffs and weak job growth, the path forward remains uncertain. While the U.S. consumer has demonstrated remarkable adaptability, the long-term sustainability of this resilience is in question. With inflation drifting upward and labor markets softening, the risk of a broader economic slowdown looms, especially if these factors persist. The next few months will be pivotal in determining whether the current stability holds or gives way to a more pronounced retrenchment [5].
Source: [5] PCE data paints a solid picture, but hidden cracks show ...
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Arthur Hayes’ New Article: BTC May Drop to 80,000 Before Kicking Off a New Round of “Money Printing” Rally
The bulls are right; over time, the money printer will inevitably go “brrrr.”

Mars Morning News | Federal Reserve officials divided on December rate cut, at least three dissenting votes, Bitcoin's expected decline may extend to $80,000
Bitcoin and Ethereum prices have experienced significant declines, with disagreements over Federal Reserve interest rate policies increasing market uncertainty. The mainstream crypto treasury company mNAV fell below 1, and traders are showing strong bearish sentiment. Vitalik criticized FTX for violating Ethereum’s decentralization principles. The supply of PYUSD has surged, with PayPal continuing to strengthen its presence in the stablecoin market. Summary generated by Mars AI. This summary was produced by the Mars AI model, and the accuracy and completeness of its content are still being iteratively updated.

"Sell-off" countdown: 61,000 BTC about to be dumped—why is it much scarier than "Mt. Gox"?
The UK government plans to sell 61,000 seized bitcoins to fill its fiscal gap, which will result in long-term selling pressure on the market.

A $500,000 lesson: He made the right prediction but ended up in debt
The article discusses a trading incident on the prediction market Polymarket following the end of the U.S. government shutdown. Star trader YagsiTtocS lost $500,000 by ignoring market rules, while ordinary trader sargallot earned more than $100,000 by carefully reading the rules. The event highlights the importance of understanding market regulations. Summary generated by Mars AI. This summary was generated by the Mars AI model, and its accuracy and completeness are still being iteratively improved.
