Regulators Shift Focus: EU Prioritizes Compliance Over Punishment in Google Case
- EU to impose smaller antitrust fine on Google, reflecting Ribera's compliance-focused strategy over punitive measures. - Penalty stems from 4-year probe into Google's adtech favoritism, avoiding past billion-euro fines but maintaining regulatory pressure. - Google's $264B adtech revenue faces scrutiny without forced divestiture, contrasting with Vestager's breakup proposals. - U.S. Chrome browser antitrust ruling could influence EU enforcement, though European-led breakup remains unlikely.
The European Union is expected to impose a modest antitrust fine on Google in the coming weeks, marking a shift in approach under the current EU antitrust chief, Teresa Ribera. The fine, reportedly smaller than previous penalties, reflects a broader strategy that prioritizes curbing anti-competitive practices over imposing large financial penalties. The decision stems from a four-year investigation initiated by the European Publishers Council, which accused Google of favoring its own advertising services over those of its competitors in its adtech business [1].
Reuters sources indicate that the fine will not reach the scale of the 4.3 billion euro penalty imposed in 2018 for Android-related anti-competitive behavior, nor will it approach the 2.42 billion euro or 1.49 billion euro fines levied in 2017 and 2019, respectively. Instead, it will align with the EU’s evolving regulatory strategy under Ribera, which emphasizes compliance over punitive measures. This approach marks a departure from the enforcement style of Ribera’s predecessor, Margrethe Vestager, who was known for imposing substantial fines on major tech firms [1].
The case against Google centers on allegations that the company used its dominant position in the digital advertising space to disadvantage rivals. Google’s adtech business generated over $264 billion in advertising revenue in the last fiscal year, accounting for 75.6% of the company’s total revenue. Despite its dominance, the EU has not demanded the divestiture of any part of Google’s adtech operations, a contrast with earlier suggestions by Vestager to potentially break up parts of the business [1].
The upcoming fine is not the first time the EU has taken regulatory action against Google. In July 2025, a group of independent publishers filed an antitrust complaint alleging that Google’s AI Overviews feature was using their content without offering users an opt-out option. The publishers argued that continued use of their material could cause irreversible damage to their business models. Additionally, the UK’s competition watchdog is also investigating Google’s search and search advertising dominance [1].
Google has consistently challenged the EU’s interpretation of the adtech sector, arguing in a 2023 blog post that the Commission’s understanding of the market is flawed. The company has emphasized that publishers and advertisers have numerous choices, and users choose its services voluntarily. However, the EU’s enforcement actions continue to mount, with both regulatory and legal challenges shaping the landscape of digital competition [1].
The broader regulatory environment is also being shaped by developments in the U.S., where a federal court is set to rule on whether Google must spin off its Chrome browser. A ruling in favor of the U.S. Department of Justice could set a precedent that influences EU policy. While a European-led breakup of Google remains unlikely due to political and legal constraints, the U.S. decision could prompt a shift in enforcement strategies on both sides of the Atlantic [2].
Source:

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
MAGIC +1046.91% in 24 Hours Amid Sharp Short-Term Gains
- MAGIC surged 1046.91% in 24 hours, 5691.23% in 30 days, but fell 4727.66% over one year, highlighting extreme short-term volatility. - The rally was driven by algorithmic momentum and speculative trading, with no official catalysts or fundamental improvements reported. - A backtested strategy (buy after ≥5% daily gains, hold 5 days) showed marginal 1.8% returns but poor risk-adjusted performance (Sharpe ratio 0.10). - Analysts suggest refining entry/exit triggers or extending holding periods to improve t

Bitcoin's Short Liquidation Risks and the Looming Short Squeeze: A Derivatives Market Analysis
- Bitcoin’s derivatives markets face a self-reinforcing short squeeze in August 2025 due to extreme leverage and fragile structure. - A $107,440 support breakdown could trigger $1.5B in short liquidations, with 74% losses concentrated in long positions. - Ethereum mirrors Bitcoin’s risks, with -$1.55B net shorts and $2B potential forced coverings above $4,872. - Institutional ETF inflows ($54B) contrast with leveraged fragility, as 5–8% corrections risk $1.8B in weekly liquidations. - Investors warn levera

Navigating September’s Crypto Volatility: Strategic Opportunities Amid Seasonal Headwinds
- Bitcoin historically underperforms in September (-7.5% avg) but often rebounds in October (+18.5% avg), with 2025 trends amplified by Fed policy shifts and altcoin dynamics. - 2025 volatility is driven by Bitcoin's 57.4% dominance decline, Ethereum's 2.15 MVRV ratio, and $39.5B in leveraged positions, signaling potential 20-30% corrections. - Strategic positioning includes September shorting (7.66% annualized returns) and October longs on Ethereum/Solana, while altcoin exposure targets high-utility token

Silver's Next Bull Phase: Geopolitical Tensions and Green Energy Demand Converge to Drive Price Surge
- Global silver markets face a critical inflection point driven by geopolitical tensions, green energy demand, and monetary policy shifts. - Supply constraints intensify as Mexico's production declines 5% amid regulatory changes, while China's trade tensions disrupt 45% of industrial silver demand. - Solar PV and EV adoption will consume 30% of global silver demand by 2030, creating a structural 149M-ounce deficit as mine output grows just 2% annually. - Dollar weakness and gold-silver ratio imbalances (80

Trending news
MoreCrypto prices
More








