Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesEarnWeb3SquareMore
Trade
Spot
Buy and sell crypto with ease
Margin
Amplify your capital and maximize fund efficiency
Onchain
Going Onchain, without going Onchain!
Convert
Zero fees, no slippage
Explore
Launchhub
Gain the edge early and start winning
Copy
Copy elite trader with one click
Bots
Simple, fast, and reliable AI trading bot
Trade
USDT-M Futures
Futures settled in USDT
USDC-M Futures
Futures settled in USDC
Coin-M Futures
Futures settled in cryptocurrencies
Explore
Futures guide
A beginner-to-advanced journey in futures trading
Futures promotions
Generous rewards await
Overview
A variety of products to grow your assets
Simple Earn
Deposit and withdraw anytime to earn flexible returns with zero risk
On-chain Earn
Earn profits daily without risking principal
Structured Earn
Robust financial innovation to navigate market swings
VIP and Wealth Management
Premium services for smart wealth management
Loans
Flexible borrowing with high fund security
A decade after Buffett's "merger of the century," Kraft Heinz is reportedly close to a breakup.

A decade after Buffett's "merger of the century," Kraft Heinz is reportedly close to a breakup.

老虎证券老虎证券2025/08/30 21:07
Show original
By:老虎证券

Kraft Heinz Company (KHC.US) is close to finalizing a split plan, intending to separate this major American food and beverage company into two independent entities, with an official announcement possibly coming as soon as next week.

According to sources, the food giant plans to spin off its grocery business—which includes products such as Kraft Mac & Cheese, Velveeta cheese, Jell-O, and Kool-Aid—into a separate entity valued at approximately $20 billion; the remaining business will focus on faster-growing categories such as ketchup and condiments, forming a smaller independent company.

This split essentially reverses the 2015 merger between Kraft Foods Group and H.J. Heinz Company, which originally created the third-largest food and beverage company in the United States.

The 2015 merger was driven by Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway and 3G Capital. According to the agreement at the time, Kraft shareholders held 49% of the merged company, while Heinz shareholders held 51%. In addition to shares of the merged company, Kraft shareholders also received a special cash dividend of $16.50 per share, fully funded by Heinz shareholders (Berkshire Hathaway and 3G Capital) through equity contributions. At the time of the merger, the combined revenue of the two companies was about $28 billion, but this figure subsequently shrank to $6.35 billion.

Buffett said at the time of the merger, “I am very pleased to be involved in bringing together these two outstanding companies and their iconic brands. This is exactly the kind of transaction I like—combining two world-class organizations to create value for shareholders. I am excited about the future opportunities for this newly merged company.”

To boost profits, the newly formed Kraft Heinz Company immediately launched cost-cutting initiatives and embarked on an acquisition spree, including the failed $143 billion bid for Unilever (UL.US) in 2017.

However, while the company was busy cutting costs and seeking acquisitions, it failed to notice that consumer tastes had shifted toward healthier food choices. As market demand for processed cheese, hot dogs, and similar products declined, the company’s sales came under pressure. Ultimately, it had to admit that the valuations of its Kraft and Oscar Mayer brands were far below expectations, resulting in a $15 billion asset impairment charge.

Additionally, then-CEO Bernardo Hess also admitted the failure of zero-based budgeting (where every budget cycle requires all expenses to be justified from zero). In 2019, Hess stated, “We were overly optimistic about the effects of cost savings, and those expectations ultimately were not realized.”

Amid a series of difficulties, Kraft Heinz’s stock price continued to fall. After peaking in 2017, its share price dropped by a cumulative 61% over the decade following the merger, while the S&P 500 index rose by as much as 237% during the same period.

This performance forced Berkshire Hathaway to further write down its 27.4% stake in Kraft Heinz, following a $3 billion impairment in 2019 with an additional $3.8 billion write-down.

Weighed down by rising production costs, Kraft Heinz’s profitability has also continued to decline, and by 2025, it had fallen into losses.

With virtually no other options, the company is now considering a split to resolve its difficulties, but this strategy is unlikely to rescue the struggling food and beverage giant.

Seeking Alpha investment platform analyst Alan Galecki commented, “I don’t see any value being created by the split,” adding, “I worry that we’ll just end up with two ‘sickly’ companies.”

Another analyst team, TQP Research, added: “The proposed split requires both independent entities to achieve strong profit and loss growth, but empirical evidence shows that Kraft Heinz’s split is unlikely to create new value for shareholders.”

Wall Street seems to share this view. Since rumors of the split first emerged last month, Kraft Heinz’s stock price has risen only 3%.

0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

PoolX: Earn new token airdrops
Lock your assets and earn 10%+ APR
Lock now!

You may also like

BIO - +43600% YOY - Due to 1-Year Surge and 1-Month Spike

- BIO surged 43,600% in 1 year but recently fell 159% in 24 hours amid extreme volatility. - Technical analysts link sharp swings to overbought conditions and unsustainable short-term buying frenzies. - Backtesting strategies aim to identify historical assets with similar 1-month (16,490%) or 1-year (43,600%) surges. - The pattern raises questions about market dynamics and risk management in volatile digital assets.

ainvest2025/08/31 13:03
BIO - +43600% YOY - Due to 1-Year Surge and 1-Month Spike

Bitcoin News Today: Bitcoin's Survival May Hinge on BTCfi's Ability to Reignite Fees

- Bitcoin transaction fees have plummeted over 80% since April 2025, with 15% of blocks mined at minimal cost, threatening miner profitability and network security. - BTCfi (Bitcoin-native DeFi) emerges as a potential solution by driving onchain activity through financial applications, generating fee revenue via Bitcoin transactions. - Layer 2 innovations like Lightning Network, ZK-Rollups, and BitVM compete to address scalability, offering distinct trade-offs in speed, privacy, and security for Bitcoin's

ainvest2025/08/31 13:03
Bitcoin News Today: Bitcoin's Survival May Hinge on BTCfi's Ability to Reignite Fees

Thailand's Digital Wallet Pilot Lets Crypto Tourists Spend, Not Withdraw

- Crypto millionaires drive demand for luxury travel and goods, using digital assets to fund lifestyles via private jets, cruises, and high-end hotels. - Thailand’s TouristDigiPay pilot converts crypto to baht in a regulatory sandbox, targeting digital nomads and crypto tourists with spending caps and anti-money laundering safeguards. - U.S. high-net-worth individuals increasingly travel to Europe for luxury purchases, leveraging favorable exchange rates and VAT refunds despite customs declarations. - Gove

ainvest2025/08/31 13:03
Thailand's Digital Wallet Pilot Lets Crypto Tourists Spend, Not Withdraw

Bitcoin's Long-Term Price Potential: A Macro and Institutional Perspective

- Bitcoin’s price is driven by macroeconomic trends (M2 growth, dollar strength) and institutional adoption (ETFs, global reserves), with 2025 M2 hitting $55.48 trillion and ETF inflows reaching $50B. - Fixed supply and halving cycles enhance Bitcoin’s inflation-hedging appeal, contrasting with U.S. CPI (2.7%) and showing stronger alignment with five-year breakeven rates than direct CPI correlations. - Institutional adoption normalizes Bitcoin as a portfolio staple, with 25% of global trading volume now vi

ainvest2025/08/31 13:00
Bitcoin's Long-Term Price Potential: A Macro and Institutional Perspective