Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesEarnWeb3SquareMore
Trade
Spot
Buy and sell crypto with ease
Margin
Amplify your capital and maximize fund efficiency
Onchain
Going Onchain, without going Onchain!
Convert & block trade
Convert crypto with one click and zero fees
Explore
Launchhub
Gain the edge early and start winning
Copy
Copy elite trader with one click
Bots
Simple, fast, and reliable AI trading bot
Trade
USDT-M Futures
Futures settled in USDT
USDC-M Futures
Futures settled in USDC
Coin-M Futures
Futures settled in cryptocurrencies
Explore
Futures guide
A beginner-to-advanced journey in futures trading
Futures promotions
Generous rewards await
Overview
A variety of products to grow your assets
Simple Earn
Deposit and withdraw anytime to earn flexible returns with zero risk
On-chain Earn
Earn profits daily without risking principal
Structured Earn
Robust financial innovation to navigate market swings
VIP and Wealth Management
Premium services for smart wealth management
Loans
Flexible borrowing with high fund security
Bitcoin’s Fundamental Dilemma: Balancing Spam Prevention and the Threat of Censorship

Bitcoin’s Fundamental Dilemma: Balancing Spam Prevention and the Threat of Censorship

Bitget-RWA2025/09/27 17:10
By:Coin World

- Bitcoin developer Luke Dashjr denies proposing a hard fork to create a multisig committee for retroactively altering blockchain data, including removing illicit content like CSAM via ZKPs. - The controversy highlights a divide between Bitcoin Knots (strict spam filters) and Core (permissive approach), with critics warning of censorship risks and regulatory capture. - Market volatility followed, as Bitcoin’s price dropped 2.2% post-leak, though no direct causal link was confirmed, reflecting fears of comp

Bitcoin’s Fundamental Dilemma: Balancing Spam Prevention and the Threat of Censorship image 0

Bitcoin Developer Faces Backlash Over Alleged Hard Fork Suggestion

Luke Dashjr, who maintains the

Knots project, has refuted accusations that he advocated for a hard fork to introduce a trusted multisignature committee with the power to retroactively change the blockchain. The allegations, initially reported by The Rage on September 25, 2025, referenced supposed leaked messages implying Dashjr supported a system to remove illegal material, such as child sexual abuse content (CSAM), through zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs) and a multisig committee [ 1 ]. Dashjr firmly denied these claims, saying, “The reality is I have not suggested a hard fork or anything similar,” and accused his critics of “grasping at straws to smear me and sabotage my attempts to protect Bitcoin once again” [ 1 ].

This dispute has reignited the ongoing rift between the Bitcoin Knots and Bitcoin Core communities. Knots enforces more rigorous rules to block non-financial data like Ordinals and Runes tokens, whereas Core developers generally allow such data [ 1 ]. The rumored hard fork, if realized, would create a unique process to remove data after confirmation, diverging from Bitcoin’s consensus mechanism, where reorganizations are rare and economically discouraged. Opponents warn that such a change could open the door to forced removals, politically motivated censorship, or regulatory overreach [ 2 ].

Industry responses have been sharply divided. Udi Wertheimer, co-founder of Taproot Wizards and the Ordinals project, dismissed the article as a “hit piece,” stressing that the leaked chats only explored theoretical ideas like ZKPs for filtering spam without splitting the network [ 1 ]. Blockstream CEO Adam Back cautioned that the proposal “bypassed slippery slope concerns” and “went straight to implementing censorship technology” previously criticized as a threat to Bitcoin’s unchangeable nature [ 2 ]. Abra’s founder Bill Barhydt compared the situation to a “second Bitcoin war,” warning that rumors of a hard fork could be used as a “bait-and-switch” by a minority group [ 2 ].

The controversy has also led to market turbulence. Bitcoin’s value dropped 2.2% to $109,000 within a day of the leak, and was down 5.5% over the previous week [ 1 ]. Although no direct cause has been confirmed, the price decline coincided with growing uncertainty. The leaked messages, which mentioned a “buried-state modification” to flag questionable transactions, heightened concerns that Bitcoin’s resistance to censorship—a fundamental aspect of its design—might be at risk [ 2 ].

Dashjr has not released any technical documentation or rollout plan for the supposed mechanism, leaving the discussion based on speculation. The lack of an official proposal has led some to doubt the authenticity of the leak, with The Rage’s reporter L0la L33tz noting the dangers of “destroying Bitcoin over JPEGs” [ 2 ]. Meanwhile, some developers are urging restraint, suggesting that protocol changes should be considered over centuries to prevent destabilizing the network [ 2 ].

This episode highlights the deep philosophical divide over Bitcoin’s governance: should the protocol remain a neutral platform for settlement, or should developers actively block non-monetary uses? Supporters of Dashjr argue that tighter spam controls preserve Bitcoin’s financial purity, while critics see any centralized oversight as fundamentally opposed to its decentralized nature [ 1 ]. As the debate continues, the community is split on whether the proposed hard fork is a necessary step forward or a fundamental threat to Bitcoin’s foundational values.

0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

PoolX: Earn new token airdrops
Lock your assets and earn 10%+ APR
Lock now!

You may also like

"Institutional Support or Meme Frenzy: Crypto's Defining Moment in 2025"

- Avalanche (AVAX) and Litecoin (LTC) show resilience in Q4 2025, driven by institutional adoption and ETF expectations. - BullZilla ($BZIL) presale raises $620K with 6,048% ROI projections, leveraging meme-coin dynamics and 70% APY staking. - AVAX's Layer-1 architecture and LTC's low-fee model contrast with BullZilla's speculative approach, highlighting market strategy divergence. - Analysts warn of BullZilla's liquidity risks and regulatory uncertainties for AVAX/LTC ETFs, emphasizing risk differentiatio

Bitget-RWA2025/09/27 20:54
"Institutional Support or Meme Frenzy: Crypto's Defining Moment in 2025"