Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesEarnSquareMore
The Reinforcement Gap — or the reason certain AI abilities advance more rapidly than others

The Reinforcement Gap — or the reason certain AI abilities advance more rapidly than others

Bitget-RWA2025/10/05 20:06
By:Bitget-RWA

AI-powered coding tools are advancing at a remarkable pace. For those outside the programming world, it might be difficult to grasp just how rapidly things are evolving. With the introduction of GPT-5 and Gemini 2.5, developers now have access to a fresh array of automated techniques, and Sonnet 4.5 continued this trend just last week.  

Meanwhile, progress in other areas is moving at a slower rate. If you use AI to draft emails, you’re likely experiencing similar results as you did a year ago. Even as the underlying models improve, the end-user experience doesn’t always reflect those gains—especially when the AI is multitasking as a chatbot. While AI continues to advance, the improvements are no longer spread evenly across all applications. 

The reason for this uneven progress is more straightforward than it appears. Coding platforms benefit from billions of quantifiable tests, which help train them to generate functional code. This process, known as reinforcement learning (RL), has arguably been the main engine behind AI’s recent breakthroughs and is becoming increasingly sophisticated. While RL can involve human evaluators, it’s most effective when there’s a clear-cut success or failure metric, allowing for countless iterations without the need for human judgment.  

As reinforcement learning becomes more central to product development, we’re witnessing a clear divide between abilities that can be automatically assessed and those that cannot. Skills well-suited to RL, such as debugging and advanced mathematics, are improving rapidly, whereas areas like writing are seeing only gradual enhancements. 

In essence, a gap is forming due to reinforcement learning—and this divide is quickly becoming a key factor in determining what AI systems are capable of. 

In many respects, software engineering is ideally suited for reinforcement learning. Even before the rise of AI, there was an entire field focused on stress-testing software to ensure reliability before deployment. Every piece of code, no matter how well-crafted, must undergo unit, integration, and security testing, among others. Developers routinely use these checks to confirm their code works, and as Google’s senior director for developer tools recently pointed out, these tests are equally valuable for verifying AI-generated code. Moreover, their systematic and repeatable nature makes them perfect for reinforcement learning at scale. 

Validating a well-composed email or a high-quality chatbot reply is far more challenging, as these tasks are subjective and difficult to measure on a large scale. Still, not all tasks fit neatly into “easy to test” or “hard to test” categories. While there isn’t a ready-made testing suite for things like quarterly financial statements or actuarial analysis, a well-funded accounting startup could likely develop one. Some testing systems will outperform others, and some organizations will devise smarter solutions, but ultimately, the ability to test a process will determine whether it can become a practical product or remain just a promising demonstration.  

Some tasks prove more testable than expected. For example, I would have previously classified AI-generated video as difficult to evaluate, but the significant advancements in OpenAI’s Sora 2 model suggest otherwise. In Sora 2, objects no longer appear or vanish abruptly, faces maintain consistent features, and the generated footage adheres to physical laws in both obvious and subtle ways. I suspect that robust reinforcement learning systems are responsible for each of these improvements. Together, they distinguish realistic visuals from mere digital illusions. 

It’s important to note that this isn’t a fixed law of AI. The current prominence of reinforcement learning in AI development could shift as technology evolves. However, as long as RL remains the primary method for bringing AI products to market, the reinforcement gap will likely continue to widen—impacting both startups and the broader economy. If a process is well-suited to RL, automation is likely to follow, potentially displacing current workers. For example, whether healthcare services can be trained via RL will have major consequences for the economy in the coming decades. And if breakthroughs like Sora 2 are any indication, answers may arrive sooner than we expect.

0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

PoolX: Earn new token airdrops
Lock your assets and earn 10%+ APR
Lock now!

You may also like

Bitcoin News Update: Bitcoin Remains Steady While Altcoins Plunge Amid Market Sell-Off

- Bitcoin stabilizes near $93,555 amid market turmoil while altcoins hit multi-month lows due to $801M in 24-hour liquidations. - A 13-year dormant Satoshi-era wallet triggering 2% price drop and fear index hitting 14/100 heightens bearish concerns. - Cboe's perpetual-style crypto futures and global stimulus packages may reshape liquidity as Bitcoin tests $100,000 threshold. - Galaxy Digital notes algorithmic deleveraging rather than systemic weakness, with $3B in DeFi borrows signaling structural shifts.

Bitget-RWA2025/11/20 11:52
Bitcoin News Update: Bitcoin Remains Steady While Altcoins Plunge Amid Market Sell-Off

COAI Token Fraud: Warning Signs in Cryptocurrency Ventures and Ways for Investors to Safeguard Themselves in 2025

- COAI token's 88% price drop in 2025 caused $116.8M losses, highlighting DeFi risks. - Technical flaws and regulatory gaps exposed systemic DeFi vulnerabilities through COAI's collapse. - 87.9% token concentration among ten wallets enabled manipulation and panic selling. - Experts urge due diligence, AI tools, and diversification to mitigate crypto risks. - The collapse underscores the need for transparency and unified global crypto regulations.

Bitget-RWA2025/11/20 11:52

COAI's Latest Price Decline: Market Drivers and Prospects for Investment Rebound

- ChainOpera AI (COAI) fell 88% year-to-date amid AI/crypto sector governance issues and CLARITY Act regulatory uncertainty. - Technical analysis shows oversold RSI and whale accumulation, suggesting short-term rebound potential with key resistance at $5.40-$7.33. - Analysts highlight 121% upside to $9.09 if COAI breaks resistance, but warn of further decline below $3.97 to $2.15 due to sector volatility. - Long-term recovery depends on CLARITY Act compliance clarity and AI-blockchain innovation progress,

Bitget-RWA2025/11/20 11:52

Hyperliquid (HYPE) Price Rally: Advancements in On-Chain Liquidity and Investor Sentiment for 2025

- Hyperliquid (HYPE) 2025 innovations-HIP-3 Growth Mode and BLP-boost liquidity via 90% fee cuts and shared pools, attracting institutional-grade trading. - TVL reaches $2.15B with $303B October volume and $1.3B buybacks, but price dips below $42.75 resistance amid bearish MACD and declining RSI. - On-chain metrics show $30B daily volume and 10.89% open interest surge, yet retail participation wanes after $4.9M market maker loss during Popcat manipulation. - Technical analysis highlights $35-$30 support ri

Bitget-RWA2025/11/20 11:52