How Bitcoin Hype Left Retail Buyers $17 Billion Poorer
A recent 10X Research report has estimated that retail investors lost about $17 billion due to their exposure to Bitcoin treasury companies.
The losses reflect a broader decline in investor enthusiasm for Digital Asset Treasury Companies (DATCOs). Firms such as MicroStrategy and Metaplanet have seen their stocks tumble in tandem with Bitcoin’s recent price slump.
Bitcoin Treasury Firms Wiped Out $17 Billion in Retail Wealth
According to the report, many investors turned to these DATCOs to gain indirect exposure to Bitcoin. These firms typically issue shares at a premium to their underlying Bitcoin holdings, using the raised capital to buy more BTC.
10x Research noted that the strategy worked well when Bitcoin’s price rose, as stock valuations often outpaced the asset’s spot gains. However, as market sentiment cooled and Bitcoin’s momentum faded, those premiums collapsed.
As a result, investors who bought during the frenzy of inflated valuations have collectively lost about $17 billion. The firm also estimated that new shareholders overpaid for Bitcoin exposure by roughly $20 billion through these equity premiums.
These numbers are unsurprising considering BeInCrypto previously reported that global companies have raised over $86 billion in 2025 to buy cryptocurrencies.
Notably, this figure surpasses the total US initial public offerings this year.
Yet, despite this massive inflow, the performance of Bitcoin-linked equities has recently lagged behind the broader market.
For context, Strategy’s (formerly MicroStrategy) MSTR stock has fallen more than 20% since August. Tokyo-based Metaplanet, according to Strategy Tracker data, also lost over 60% of its value during the same period.
Bitcoin DATCOs mNAVs Decline
At the same time, their market-to-net-asset-value (mNAV) ratios, once a measure of investor confidence, have also deteriorated.
MicroStrategy now trades around 1.4x its Bitcoin holdings, while Metaplanet has slipped below 1.0x for the first time since adopting its Bitcoin treasury model in 2024.
“Those once-celebrated NAV premiums have collapsed, leaving investors holding the empty cup while executives walked away with the gold,” 10x Research stated.
Across the market, nearly one-fifth of all listed Bitcoin treasury firms reportedly trade below their net asset value.
The contrast is striking given that Bitcoin recently hit a record high above $126,000 this month before pulling back after President Donald Trump’s tariff threats against China.
Still, Brian Brookshire, head of Bitcoin strategy at H100 Group AB, argued that mNAV ratios are cyclical and do not reflect long-term value. H100 Group AB is the largest Bitcoin-holding firm in the Nordic region.
“Most BTCTCs trading near 1x mNAV have only arrived there within the past couple weeks. By definition, not a norm…even for MSTR, there is no such thing as a normal mNAV. It’s a volatile, cyclical phenomenon,” he said.
Nonetheless, analysts at 10X Research said the current episode marks “the end of financial alchemy” for Bitcoin treasuries, where inflated share issuance once created the illusion of limitless upside.
Considering this, the firm stated that these DATCOs will now be judged by earnings discipline rather than market euphoria.
“With volatility falling and the easy gains gone, these firms face a hard pivot from marketing-driven momentum to real market discipline. The next act won’t be about magic—it will be about who can still generate alpha when the audience stops believing,” 10X Research concluded.
The post How Bitcoin Hype Left Retail Buyers $17 Billion Poorer appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
The Federal Reserve's Change in Policy and Its Impact on Cryptocurrency Markets
- Fed's 2025 policy tightening and regulatory shifts reshaped crypto markets, triggering capital reallocation and volatility amid $340B balance sheet contraction. - Bitcoin ETFs lost $3.79B in November 2025 as investors shifted to stablecoins and altcoins, driven by inflation hedging and regulatory clarity under the GENIUS Act. - Crypto-ETF performance diverged sharply, with Solana/XRP funds attracting $421M/$410M inflows while Bitcoin ETFs faced stagnation despite $22.32B net creations. - Policy uncertain

Solana's Latest Price Drop: Analyzing Systemic Vulnerabilities in Advanced Blockchain Platforms
- Solana's 2025 price drop and declining user activity, despite strong on-chain metrics, highlight systemic risks in high-performance blockchains. - Network Value to Transaction (NVT) ratio spikes and macroeconomic headwinds exposed vulnerabilities in consensus mechanisms and validator centralization. - Security breaches, regulatory uncertainties, and cross-chain bridge risks amplified downward pressure, contrasting with whale accumulation and real-world asset adoption growth. - Case studies of Avalanche a

SOL Price Forecast for 2025: Can the Altcoin Surge Last?
- Solana (SOL) gains traction in 2025 through institutional partnerships and ETFs, boosting blockchain adoption. - Despite $101.7M ETF inflows, SOL prices fell 30% by December, highlighting macroeconomic pressures over institutional demand. - Proposed inflation reduction (SIMD-0411) and short-term rallies signal resilience, but Bitcoin/Ethereum dominance complicates altcoin sustainability. - Analysts project $400–$500 SOL by year-end, contingent on resolving rate volatility and global economic uncertaintie

The BTC Collapse: Examining the Triggers and Consequences for 2026
- Bitcoin's 2026 collapse risk stems from leverage, quantum threats, and macroeconomic fragility, mirroring 2008/1929 crises. - Leverage-driven liquidation loops and corporate Bitcoin holdings create self-fulfilling price cascades across crypto and traditional markets. - Quantum computing could break Bitcoin's cryptography, while regulatory uncertainty amplifies systemic risks in its financialized ecosystem. - Historical parallels highlight recurring patterns of speculative excess and leverage, urging robu

