Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesEarnSquareMore
ChainOpera AI Token Collapse: A Warning Story for AI-Powered DeFi Management

ChainOpera AI Token Collapse: A Warning Story for AI-Powered DeFi Management

Bitget-RWA2025/11/19 11:30
By:Bitget-RWA

- COAI token's 96% value drop in late 2025 exposed risks of centralized AI governance in DeFi, with 10 wallets controlling 87.9% of supply. - Technical vulnerabilities and untested AI models failed to stabilize liquidity crises, while regulatory ambiguity under GENIUS/CLARITY acts worsened governance paralysis. - HTX DAO's decentralized governance model, featuring token burning and community voting, demonstrated resilience through deflationary mechanisms and aligned incentives. - Academic analysis highligh

The dramatic fall of the ChainOpera AI (COAI) token at the end of 2025—with its value plummeting by 96%—has emerged as a pivotal example of the dangers associated with AI-led governance in decentralized finance (DeFi). This incident highlights the vulnerability of systems where algorithmic control meets centralized authority, especially in unstable market conditions. As both investors and regulators deal with the aftermath, the COAI debacle brings to light essential insights regarding governance models, technical soundness, and regulatory readiness in AI-driven crypto platforms.

The COAI Downfall: Governance and Technical Shortcomings

The devastating loss in COAI token value stemmed from a mix of poor governance alignment and exploitable technical flaws. By the close of 2025, just ten wallets held 87.9% of all tokens, resulting in a highly centralized governance setup that

. When algorithmic stablecoins like and deUSD failed, liquidity dried up across the ecosystem, but COAI’s governance—dependent on unproven AI algorithms— . in AI-related technical weaknesses during the third quarter of 2025, further revealing the project’s lack of thorough smart contract evaluations.

These problems were made worse by regulatory challenges.

increased compliance expenses and legal ambiguity, placing COAI in a regulatory gray zone that hindered swift responses. This uncertainty, combined with centralized control, fueled a cycle of panic selling and shrinking liquidity.

Centralized and Decentralized AI Governance: A Fundamental Contrast

Scholarly research into AI-based governance in DeFi points to a clear divide between centralized and decentralized approaches. Centralized systems, while allowing for quick decisions, are prone to single points of failure. For example,

by a handful of major token holders, whose conflicting interests worsened the crisis. On the other hand, decentralized frameworks—such as those used by HTX DAO— and on-chain processes. , which included token burning and deflationary policies, showed strength by tying long-term value to active community involvement.

Yet, decentralized AI governance also faces hurdles.

that algorithmic bias and scalability limitations can threaten openness and coordination in decentralized setups. For instance, AI tools assessing DAO voting patterns might unintentionally benefit certain groups or fail to adjust to rapid market changes. how untested AI systems, when combined with centralized authority, can intensify instability instead of reducing it.

Case Examples and Crisis Management

The COAI episode is not unique. Academic studies on DeFi instability show that governance breakdowns during crises can trigger widespread failures.

that 55% of DeFi-related criminal incidents led to an average 14% drop in governance token prices. This mirrors what happened with COAI, where during the stablecoin meltdown set off a downward spiral of selling.

In comparison, initiatives like HTX DAO demonstrate how decentralized governance can help steady markets. By

by the third quarter of 2025, HTX DAO established a deflationary system that encouraged long-term investment and curbed speculative trading. This stands in stark contrast to COAI’s centralized approach, which was unable to manage liquidity threats promptly.

Impacts for Regulators and Investors

The downfall of COAI has compelled both regulators and investors to reassess the effectiveness of existing policies.

regarding AI tokens left projects like COAI facing legal uncertainties. At the same time, among U.S. regulatory bodies (such as the SEC and CFTC) led to fragmented investor safeguards, allowing bad actors to exploit regulatory loopholes.

For those investing, this event highlights the necessity of thorough research.

that projects with decentralized management, comprehensive technical checks, and clear regulatory status are better equipped to handle market swings. For example, through convertible debt to finance buybacks and purchase (SOL), showing how diversified funding strategies can provide a cushion during market turbulence.

Conclusion: Insights for What Lies Ahead

The COAI token’s collapse stands as a warning for the DeFi industry. While AI-powered governance holds great promise, its effectiveness depends on decentralization, technical integrity, and regulatory harmony. Projects that emphasize community-led governance, transparent AI systems, and proactive compliance—like HTX DAO—are more likely to weather crises. In contrast, those that stick to centralized authority and unproven algorithms risk repeating COAI’s mistakes.

As DeFi continues to develop, investors should insist on both accountability and innovation. The adoption of AI in finance is inevitable, but its dangers can only be managed through balanced governance and strong regulatory measures. The COAI incident is not the conclusion for AI in DeFi—it is a prompt for building a more robust and fair future.

1

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

PoolX: Earn new token airdrops
Lock your assets and earn 10%+ APR
Lock now!

You may also like

Australia’s Cryptocurrency Regulations Set to Unlock $24 Billion in Value While Enhancing Investor Protections

- Australia introduces 2025 Digital Assets Framework Bill to unlock $24B productivity gains while imposing strict client asset safeguards. - Legislation creates two new crypto financial product categories under Corporations Act, requiring AFSL licensing for platforms and tokenized custody services. - Exemptions for small operators (<$10M volume) balance innovation with regulation, aligning with global trends like U.S. GENIUS Act and SEC's Project Crypto. - Industry debates regulatory proportionality as Aus

Bitget-RWA2025/11/27 06:30
Australia’s Cryptocurrency Regulations Set to Unlock $24 Billion in Value While Enhancing Investor Protections

Nexton Connects Traditional Veterinary Clinics with Modern Technology Through $4M AI Investment

- Nexton Solutions secures $4M to launch PetVivo.ai, an AI platform slashing veterinary client acquisition costs by 50–90%. - Beta results show 47 new clients per practice in six months, with a $42.53 CAC—far below industry averages. - Targeting 30,000 U.S. practices, it projects $12M ARR in Year 1, scaling to $360M by Year 5 with SaaS margins of 80–90%. - Strategic AI alliances, like C3.ai-Microsoft and Salesforce’s AI CRM focus, highlight the sector’s growth potential.

Bitget-RWA2025/11/27 06:30
Nexton Connects Traditional Veterinary Clinics with Modern Technology Through $4M AI Investment

Bitcoin News Today: Nasdaq Promotes IBIT Options to Premier Gold Standard Liquidity Level

- Nasdaq ISE proposes quadrupling IBIT options limits to 1M contracts, aligning with high-liquidity ETFs like EEM and GLD . - Current 250K contract cap hinders institutional strategies; IBIT now leads Bitcoin options by open interest, surpassing Deribit. - Proposal includes removing FLEX IBIT position limits, enabling customized hedging for large funds, with experts calling it "routine" for high-volume assets. - SEC's December 17 comment deadline precedes potential approval, which could accelerate Bitcoin'

Bitget-RWA2025/11/27 06:30
Bitcoin News Today: Nasdaq Promotes IBIT Options to Premier Gold Standard Liquidity Level

XRP News Today: XRP ETF Inflows Surpass Bitcoin Withdrawals Amid Changing Institutional Investment

- XRP ETFs absorbed 80M tokens in 24 hours, driven by institutional/retail demand, pushing AUM to $778M and outpacing Bitcoin outflows. - Grayscale's GXRP and Franklin Templeton's XRPZ led with $67.4M and $62.6M inflows, capitalizing on Ripple's $125M SEC settlement enabling spot ETFs. - ETFs pressured XRP's circulating supply, signaling confidence in its cross-border payment utility while technical indicators show cautious price recovery potential. - Market divides persist between ETF liquidity and direct

Bitget-RWA2025/11/27 06:30
XRP News Today: XRP ETF Inflows Surpass Bitcoin Withdrawals Amid Changing Institutional Investment