Aave priceAAVE

COINOTAG News reported on December 24, citing Hyperinsight monitoring that a sizable whale dumped AAVE tokens, sparking a pronounced price drop amid contested upgrade debates within the Aave ecosystem. Onchain activity shows address starting with 0x3c7 opened a 7x leveraged AAVE short position worth $2.42 million, with an entry near $151 and a liquidation trigger around $173. The position registers roughly 17% unrealized profit to date and stands as Hyperliquid’s largest AAVE short. Additionally, the same address placed a limit sell near $154 for about $780,000, pending fill, while configuring take-profit at $136 and a stop-loss at $196 to manage downside risk. These moves illustrate liquidity and risk-management dynamics in DeFi markets, where active traders use leverage to express tactical views on AAVE during periods of volatility.

BlockBeats News, December 24th, according to Hyperinsight monitoring, a whale dumped AAVE tokens, causing a sharp price drop due to the Aave community's contentious upgrade. Subsequently, the address starting with "0x3c7" opened a 7x leveraged AAVE short position, with a position size of $2.42 million, an average price of $151, a liquidation price of $173, currently showing a 17% unrealized profit, now the largest short position on AAVE on Hyperliquid. In addition to this position, the address also placed a limit sell order of about $780,000 at $154, which has not been filled yet. At the same time, it has set take-profit and stop-loss orders for the position: planning to take profit and reduce the position at $136 and stop the loss at $196.

Crypto policy dynamics are entering a new phase, as noted by industry observers. Jake Chervinsky of Variant Fund argues that the debate over tokens vs equity is only beginning, reflecting a shift from the stringent environment under former SEC chair Gary Gensler. He notes that many projects redirected value into equity during that era, and today’s evolving policy landscape invites measured experimentation in how tokens and equity can coexist. Clarity remains the north star for investors and founders. He emphasizes that token holders must know what they own, what they can control, and what lies outside their reach. On‑chain value captured by tokens contrasts with off‑chain claims tied to traditional equity. Looking ahead, the value‑capture design space remains expansive, and a single token model like stocks seems unlikely. On‑chain value should be primary, while equity carries off‑chain value, with some projects exploring tokenized securities under evolving SEC guidance.

BlockBeats News, December 24th, Jake Chervinsky, Chief Legal Officer of the cryptocurrency venture capital firm Variant Fund, posted on social media that "the debate on tokens versus equity is just beginning. Many crypto projects were born during Gary Gensler's tenure as the SEC chairman, a time when intense regulatory pressure forced development companies to channel almost all value into equity rather than tokens. Now, the policy environment is changing, new opportunities are emerging, and understanding how tokens and equity can (or cannot) work well together will require a significant amount of time and experimentation. And this experimental phase is starting now." "I don't have a specific stance on Aave's situation, I just want to emphasize one point: clarity is always the most important. Token holders must clearly know what they own, what they can control, and what they cannot control. The design space for capturing token value is extremely broad, far exceeding that of traditional equity. I believe that for quite some time, it is unlikely that a standardized token model will emerge like stocks. We believe that tokens should carry on-chain value, while equity should carry off-chain value. The core innovation unlocked by tokens is self-sovereign ownership of digital assets. Tokens allow holders to directly own and control on-chain infrastructure without relying on off-chain intermediaries." "Off-chain value is different. Token holders cannot directly own or control off-chain income or assets, so in most cases, this value should belong to equity rather than tokens. Of course, other models may also work. Some projects may choose a single-asset model with no equity at all; other projects may decide to treat their tokens as tokenized securities and comply with new SEC rules for this market in the future."